Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L W L L
Form
W W W W W W W W L LCara A Cara: Selekhmeteva 1 - 0 Peeters
Ellas han jugado 3 conjuntos en total, con Selekhmeteva victoriosa 2 y Peeters victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Selekhmeteva y Peeters fue en el W100 Madrid, el 16-04-2025, Cuartos de First, Clay, con Oksana Selekhmeteva obteniendo la victoria 1-6 7-6(2) 6-0
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oksana Selekhmeteva | 1 |
| Anouck Vrancken Peeters | 0 |
W100 Madrid(16-04-2025)
1
6
7
6
6
0
| Selekhmeteva | Estadísticas | Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 161 | Ranking | 539 |
| 138 | Highest Rank | 539 |
| 22 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 65% (169-91) | Total de Carrera V/D | 60% (108-72) |
| 57% (12-9) | Ganar/Perder | 85% (23-4) |
| $219,263 | Prize Money de Carrera | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Títulos | 3 |
| 1 | Arcilla H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bencic VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Enfrentamientos Directos Entre Selekhmeteva Y Peeters
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 |
Stats 
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Estadísticas H2H De Selekhmeteva VS Peeters Estadísticas H2H utilizadas en nuestras predicciones
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 14 | Juegos Ganados | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Faltas dobles totales | 6 |
| 2:2:37 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 2:2:37 |
| 65% (59/91) | % De Primer Servicio | 61% (54/88) |
| 61% (36/59) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 54% (29/54) |
| 44% (14/32) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 50% (17/34) |
| 45% (5/11) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 48% (42/88) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 45% (41/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Oksana Selekhmeteva
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashley Lahey
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Esther Lopez Alcaraz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
12
Total Points Won
5
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Julita Saner
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Victoria Allen
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Ann Akasha Ceuca
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Jeong Moon
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (169/91) | Win/Loss | 60% (108/72) |
| 62% (366/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (241/174) |
| 55% (3011/2493) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2043/1719) |
| 68% (55/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (44/28) |
| 67% (96/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (41/38) |
| 50% (17/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (23/6) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 293 | Aces Total | 109 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
| 823 | Total Double Faults | 827 |
| 1:31:53 | Average Match Time | 1:35:16 |
| 376.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.81 |
| 65% (10767/16486) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6597/10520) |
| 61% (6526/10767) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3876/6597) |
| 46% (2646/5718) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1700/3923) |
| 48% (1096/2265) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (742/1411) |
| 48% (8010/16808) | Return Points Win % | 49% (5022/10206) |
| 58% (11/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (14/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (125/59) | Challenger W/L | 52% (28/26) |
| 66% (19/10) | Futures W/L | 63% (80/46) |
| 65% (166/257) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (107/178) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (24/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 59% (43/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (31/57) |
| 89% (169/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (97/85) |
| 11% (169/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (97/12) |
| 20% (91/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (83/22) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
